Thursday, October 24, 2013

Informal Writing #7 - Danny Wallace


Informal Writing #7
            The following debate on the topic of “Whether the Humanities should be a requirement for all college students” took place on October 24th, 2013. The debate took place between Gordon Hunter, director of the Trowbridge initiative in the American cultures at the University of Illinois and the editor of American Literary History, and Belinda Parmer, founder of the social enterprise “Little Miss Geek”. Hunter was on the side for the Humanities to be taught at public universities while Parmer was on the side against.
Opening Statement:
Hunter: A democracy can only be as energetic as the mind of its citizens. The questions fundamental to the humanities are also fundamental to a thoughtful life. What is good, what is beauty, do we need God? What is to become of a culture when public universities are deprived of these very things that make up the fundamental pillars of our society. Are private institutions and the elite, going to be the only institutions that are allowed to experience the cultivation of imagination?
Rebuttal:
Parmer: In theory, that is all good and well but lets look at this from a realistic standpoint. I personally got a degree in French and Spanish. With that degree I went to my first job interview, they say I had a degree in both those languages and they asked me “what else can you do?” At that moment it dawned on me that the humanities can be useful in theory, but they really are not going to give you a skill set that will be useful in a job like a technical major. 
Question: With money being a current hold back on many universities and their motivation on whether or not to keep Humanities programs, what do you have to say to sway them either for or against?
Parmer: I would say that studying the humanities is a waste in our current economic situation. In an age where learning code impacts the world in a far greater way than learning literature, we must put our focus on the technical studies. If that means that humanities must be dropped in order to provide proper funding, so be it
Rebuttal:
Hunter: We cannot give up on the humanities and continue a watered down curriculum in order to provide for undergraduate seats. We must set out our priorities and recognize that with the humanities, comes a higher developed mind capable of learning.
Closing Statement:
Parmer: I feel into the gender-induced stereotype of following a career into the humanities. Not realizing that that top three paying jobs for females are all in the technical field. Now, I have a 5 year old daughter, I will not let her blindly fall into the gender stereotypes that I did. I want her to embrace the fact that a science or technical degree will not limit her creativity but expand it and broaden her horizons far more than my arts background could.
Hunter: We cannot allow for a articulately stale curriculum based on what some call necessity, to override our need for a greater and more expanding learning in the field of the humanities. The humanities have always been apart of our culture and giving up on them at public universities is one step closer to giving up on them in our society.



No comments:

Post a Comment